Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 16

Quae Post MDMA, Rebill, et coniugium?

Purus possumus ire et de MDMA. Cumque esset in usu forensi sunt millions 1980. Ut probatur in humanis rebus iam MDMA. Hactenus, ea denique facientes maxime sunt millions. Illi non es, aut aliquid cerebrum laesis. Superior reditus habere possunt etiam quam ceteras. I’ve read that alcoholic has higher income.

Cum videmus imperium recordum, oportet quod intelligatur de regimine quis vult terrent. Imperium, imperi quidquid potest cum positum sit optima. Gubernationis non scientificus. Magis vendentes, or prosecutors.

Let’s ignore the unclear statements. Saying that something is very dangerous is not exactly a clear scientific statement. So let’s examine the clear ones. Now what’s left? If the best government can come up with is “INCONCLUSIVE evidence that MDMA can interfere with memory and cognition in LONG TERM” without even describing how long and how much, that’s not very convincing.

I read about marijuana legalization issue. The best government can come up is that marijuana legalization doesn’t work because it increases use of marijuana. Cogitare de illo. If marijuana legalization actually increase murder rate, for example, government would have put it there. This is not a straw man argument. This is the best man argument. It’s the best government can put up without lying. If that’s the best you can do, bene, tough.

Now go back to rebill vs marriage.

I think we have several issues here:

1. is limitation of rationality. Not simply because you know something you know anything logically implied by it. As the saying goes, read the small print. Tamen, in reality no body would read every TOS of every website. Eodem modo, no body read the whole marriage rules and contract that can be changed all the time anyway. So a way to persuade people is to hide negative material aspects away. Few people can reason that “By the power of the state of bla bla I declare you” mean “You got to keep paying this hoes after she keep fucking others’ cock.” The logic goes that the power of the state means you agree to be governed by the whim of the states’ legislator influenced by the votes of those other cocks. But who would have thought that far?
2. Thought experiment. Say the “I agree to keep paying you cash even though you already openly ride other’s cock” is part of the marital vow. Post omnes, that’s what men actually effectively agree to right? It should be part of the “I do” thingy. Will that drop marital rate? The fact that it will shows that it’s actually a material part of marriage. Which is an important lesson why it should be part of the vow.
3. Outside legal framework, there are ways to maintain contract. One popular way is splitting the contract into small pieces. If people can enforce contract without government then they are free to decide for themselves. Coniugium, fopro exemplocan be split apart into smaller pieces. You do me one time, I pay $100 first for example. You stop sucking. I stop paying. Wait a minute…. Why is it illegal again?
4. And finally the will of the consenting parties vs the will of those who write contracts. Fiat faciem eam. Marriage may be a mistake for Beatty Chadwick. It’s a mistake so many swing voters want Beatty to make. Imagine if Beatty don’t make that mistake. Then he has 2.5 million dollars and can sleep with 10 beauties. For every Beatty, there will at least be 10 lonely males that want to vote against that under democracy. So yea, the fuck up part of marital deal will not be on the vow. What about if Beatty “import” women from Rusia? Then for every 1 Beatty there will be 10 ugly beldams that’ll never get laid. Not that someone with 2.5 million dollars will aim for ugly beldams. But women target can shift “up” and down when polygamy or women trafficking are allowed. Supervacuum dicere, I bet in US, those who opposes polygamy are usually middle class male and those who opposes women trafficking are women.
5. The point is, when you get married, everybody’s bigotic interest suddenly come into the marriage deal. It’s like asking Hitler to be Israel President.

Quae Post MDMA, Rebill, et coniugium? is a post from: Libera foro Aeterna


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 16

Trending Articles


FIAT 110 NC 115 B kiper