Look all I know is government all over the world indoctrinate kids to get married. To me that’s far more dangerous than gay indoctrination.
Marriage won’t survive competition under free market.
@Harold how does treating women as hoes means demeaning them? It still confuses me till now. Treat her like hoes means you’re paying them. Here in Asia, paying people is a way to show appreciation. It shows you worth the money.
If hot girls treat me like hoes, I will be very proud. If ugly girls treat me like hoes, I will still appreciate the offer (though will just reject). How in the earth offering to pay someone for sex means demeaning them. It makes absolute no sense..
To the opposite, ..having sex for free is demeaning. It shows that she doesn’t worth the money.
Feminazis are usually ugly. The most they can get for humping is 0. So, by dog in a manger principle, they demand 0 to be the maximum wage for hoes. Now that make sense. It fits them. Does it fit the hotties? Why not let the hotties decide?
That’s another way of showing respect. You respect her CHOICE. You don’t tell what’s good for her and decide for her. It’s as if women are so dumb they can’t figure out what’s best for them. Overriding women’s decision is rape. Now that’s demeaning.
Another confusing western idea is that it’s NOT okay for girls to ask for money, but it’s OKAY to ask for huge alimony. It’s like going to job interview and say, I don’t want high salary, but I want huge severance pay. There is no way that kind of employee will get hired under free market.
So Tiger Wood ex wife is not a hoe because she got paid $1 billion for LEAVING Tiger. But if she got paid for actually make Tiger happy, than that’s bad.
The only thing that fit the dots are interests of competitors.
In any case, it’s up to women to decide, not religious bigots or feminazis.
How in the Earth Treating Women as Hoes Means Demeaning Them? is a post from: Free Market Forever
