Vide ipsum indoctrinate scio, uxorem ducere orbem terrarum imperio. To me that’s far more dangerous than gay indoctrination.
Marriage won’t survive competition under free market.
@ Harold quid ageretur mulieres sarculis significet illos incivili? Tamen perturbat me hucusque. Tractare eam quasi uinea rastris significet reddet tibi. Hic in Asia, reddens populo gratissimum est via ad ostendendum. It shows you worth the money.
Si calidum puellas fac me sicut sarculis, Ego ero valde superbus. Si puellae turpis fac me sicut sarculis, Adhuc bene polliceantur, (quamvis iustus rejiciunt). Quam oblationem in terra reddere alicui propter sexum significat illos incivili. It makes absolute no sense..
Ad contrarias, ..having sex for free is demeaning. It shows that she doesn’t worth the money.
Feminazis are usually ugly. The most they can get for humping is 0. Sic, by dog in a manger principle, they demand 0 to be the maximum wage for hoes. Now that make sense. It fits them. Does it fit the hotties? Why not let the hotties decide?
That’s another way of showing respect. You respect her CHOICE. You don’t tell what’s good for her and decide for her. It’s as if women are so dumb they can’t figure out what’s best for them. Overriding women’s decision is rape. Now that’s demeaning.
Another confusing western idea is that it’s NOT okay for girls to ask for money, but it’s OKAY to ask for huge alimony. It’s like going to job interview and say, I don’t want high salary, but I want huge severance pay. There is no way that kind of employee will get hired under free market.
So Tiger Wood ex wife is not a hoe because she got paid $1 billion for LEAVING Tiger. But if she got paid for actually make Tiger happy, than that’s bad.
The only thing that fit the dots are interests of competitors.
In any case, it’s up to women to decide, not religious bigots or feminazis.
Quam in Tellure Judaica per feminas; sarcula Means incivili Illos? is a post from: Libera foro Aeterna